(1) The Standards are Inconsistent or Inadequate                     
Many foreign invested companies argue that domestic Chinese                      standards for Environmental Health and Safety (EHS) vary to                      those of international standards. For example, China has yet                      to set domestic standards for Non-Road Vehicles and Engine                      Emission. Another example is the lack of sound waste management                      facilities, particularly for hazardous waste.                    
According to the 2002 White Paper for American Business in                      China (White Paper), if the resulting standards vary from                      those of the US, the EU and Japan, the US companies producing                      and selling relevant equipment in China will need to develop                      and manufacture new technological components and implement                      new testing procedures to suit the new domestic standards,                      thereby drastically increasing their R&D and manufacturing                      costs. Further, if foreign enterprises have been diligently                      observing international or internal corporate standards for                      EHS, such as, in the disposal of waste products, the lack                      of adequate facilities in China may result in these foreign                      enterprises being unable to meet their regular EHS standards.                      In some cases, the lack of appropriate waste disposal facilities                      may also cause foreign enterprises to refrain from producing                      products with waste outputs that cannot be properly managed.                    
 (2) The Lack of Formal Dialogue Sessions 
The other problem faced by foreign invested companies is                      the lack of standardized procedures for formal dialogue on                      the development of EHS legislation in China. The White Paper                      reported that numerous US companies operating in China have                      stated that the existing communication channels with Chinese                      policymakers are inadequate. These dialogue session are necessary                      if China is committed to harmonizing its EHS policy with those                      of other countries. By having these dialogue sessions, the                      Chinese Government could draw on the experience and expertise                      of international enterprises operating in China, thereby ensuring                      that the needs of international and domestic enterprises are                      addressed during the legislation process. One success story                      is the harmonization of the Non-Road Vehicle and Engine Emission                      Standards between the US, the EU and Japan, which is attributed                      to extensive communication between multinational equipment                      manufacturers and government agencies.