The 135th Annual Meeting of the International Trademark Association (INTA) was held in Dallas, Texas, May 4-8 this year and once more, as usual, a delegation from Lehman, Lee, & Xu was on-hand to be active participants in this conference.

Led, as always, by the firm’s long time General Manger, Edward Lehman, the Lehman, Lee & Xu delegation to the meeting included IP attorneys and experts Karen Lau, Grace Wang, Margaret Ma, Tracy Ning, Chen Fazhi, Li Hong, Yolanda, Li, Lillian Yang, Lin Zhou, and Shunde Li.  This trip to Dallas was a first for everyone and there was much excitement and enthusiasm, as everyone anticipated what they might experience at the INTA meeting and in Dallas.

The main mission of the Lehman, Lee & Xu delegation was to hold a series of 12 “round table” discussions over the course of the 4 day meeting. Topics presented by our delegation of professionals included among other things, discussions of the latest developments in China trademark and patent laws, and timely and useful advice about trademark and patent protection. Also featured were ‘nuts and bolts” discussions about how trademarks and patents are processed in China.

By all accounts, the Lehman, Lee & Xu sponsored round table discussions were well attended and well received. As is usual for annual INTA Meetings, hundreds of people were on hand to meet and greet people, to meet with longtime clients and friends, and to just have a good time talking “IP”.  We are already looking forward to attending the 136th Annual INTA Meeting in Hong Kong in 2014.

For memories and highlights of this year’s INTA conference in Dallas, please click on the link below.
 http://blawg.lehmanlaw.com/2013/view.php

Lehman, Lee & Xu - China Trademark in the news

The China Law News keeps you on top of business, economic and political events in the China.
Blawg | Newsletter Archive | |


In the News

How to overcome the headache of protecting wine trademarks in China

So you want to sell your fine wine in China using your own well know, or perhaps not so well know trademark.  No problem right?  Just go to the China Trademark Office, submit your application with supporting documentation, pay the filing fee, and you will be good to go, right? Maybe.  China is a very different place to do business and protecting, or even obtaining a trademark maybe much more complicated than you imagined. How so?

Over the past few years, there have been many legitimate trademark holders especially in the wine-making industry whose applications have been rejected in China because of unscrupulous locals who, undoubtedly aware of trademark protection, had made applications themselves!

In fact, contrary to the France National Industrial Property Institute (INPI), which accepts registration of several identical marks, the China trademark office automatically refuses any new application that is identical or bears a close resemblance to a trademark that has already been applied for. It is a “first come, first serve” system.

The first person to apply for their trademark in China is therefore protected by the China trademark office against any new application which could cause confusion with their trademark.

This is what led to the development of the “trademark squatting” phenomenon a few years ago: Chinese companies or individuals applying for French châteaux wine trademarks, whether they are well-known or not, from the moment that the legitimate rights holder of the château wine neglected to register his trademark in China. Yet, a fraudulent application can only be cancelled if there had been intensive use in China by the legitimate owner prior to the application of the contested trademark; however, demonstrating intensive use dating back to two or three years is difficult, if not impossible, especially at a time when most of the containers were transited via Hong Kong mainly for customs reasons.

Legitimate trademark owners thus find themselves in an awkward situation with regard to their distributors who request a certificate of registration as a way of protecting themselves against infringement action, but often find it impossible to acquire from the legitimate owner.

In an effort to spare many wine-growers and trading companies these pains, and to put an end to lengthy and costly legal proceedings, we have collaborated with our Chinese colleagues on the possibility of changing trademarks applications to facilitate the registration of trademarks for peripheral activities limited to the wine sector.

With Chinese trademark law currently in a state of flux, the Chinese authorities recently agreed that the retailing of pharmaceutical products could be targeted using a trademark application.  

This possibility has not yet been transferred to the retailing of the wines or alcoholic beverages. However, it is now possible to use class 35 instead of class 33 when applying for a trademark in China for the following activities:

  • Making wines or spirits available through the communication media, for commercial             purposes;
  • License management for wine or spirits;
  • Sales promotion related to wine or spirits;
  • Import-export agencies related to wine or spirits.

Given that the Chinese trademark office does not carry out inter-class examinations, it cannot cite a class 33 application as a means of blocking another application in class 35, even if the two are identical. 

As a result, this type of application may be a clever solution with a double advantage:

  • It provides legitimate right holders with the opportunity to quickly fix a date in this class,   and to obtain a trademark registration within a year and,
  • It can be used to provide distributors with justification of ownership rights for a particular trademark in a fairly short space of time.

While this option does not address the past situation, it provides a means to anticipate the future with a greater level of legal security. Now that wine consumption in China is expected to continue rising, it is better to at least secure a certificate of registration for a trademark.

http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=d77e883d-3786-49fd-afd8-2f4cbaab3439

Edward Lehman 雷曼法学博士
Managing Director 董事长
elehman@lehmanlaw.com

LEHMAN, LEE & XU China Lawyers
雷曼律师事务所
Founder of LehmanBrown
雷曼会计师事务所创办人

Lehman, Lee & Xu is a top-tier Chinese law firm specializing in corporate, commercial, intellectual property, and labor and employment matters. For further information on any issue discussed in this edition of China Trademark In The News or for all other enquiries, please e-mail us at mail@lehmanlaw.com or visit our website at www.lehmanlaw.com.

.


© Lehman, Lee & Xu 2013.
This document has been created for educational purposes for clients, potential clients and referrers of services to Lehman, Lee & Xu, and to alert readers to the services provided by Lehman, Lee & Xu. It is not intended to serve as definitive professional or legal advice, and should not be relied upon as such. Lehman, Lee & Xu does not endorse any personal opinions which may be contained herein.
We hope that you enjoy China Trademark News. If you would like us to send you new issues by e-mail each month, please click here to subscribe. There is no charge for this service. If not, please click here to unsubscribe.